The Chilean government’s rhetoric about deploying the full strength of the law, including the antiterrorist law, against Mapuche activists resorting to violence has not cut much ice with the judiciary. Appeals courts and even the supreme court appear to be losing patience with the disregard shown by police, prosecutors and lower courts for the rules of evidence and protocols regarding the imposition of preventive detention — which only appears to confirm Mapuche claims of ‘montages’ and setups by the authorities. A string of events in February has illustrated this.
End of preview - This article contains approximately 493 words.
Subscribers: Log in now to read the full article
Not a Subscriber?
Choose from one of the following options